Should America Legalize Marijuana Essay Example for Free

Should America Legalize Marijuana Essay I. Introduction A. Attention Getter B. Specific Purpose Statement C. Credibility Statement D. Preview of Main Points (Transition) II. Body (sentences in body should be complete sentences) A. Pro/For 1 1. Supporting Material The United States is currently has over 17 trillion dollars in debt( statistic) 2. Supporting Material According to congress budget office The United States is currently has over 17 trillion dollars in debt. A country accumulates most of their debt in time of war one of the biggest and most expensive war going on right now is the war on drugs the DEA spends x dollars trying to keep marijuana of the streets just think how many more other more serious crimes can be solved if that money was spent elsewhere in the criminal justice department. Another pro of legalizing marijuana is the tax dollars we as a country can get from selling marijuana. Colorado and Washington recently legalized marijuana this year and since January through august just think how many tax dollars we can raise if marijuana was legal throughout the entire United States and that is on top of the money we are saving on from the DEA by not chasing down these pot heads. (Transition) Money and debt is not the only upside to legalizing marijuana there are countless health benefits from the intake of marijuana B. Pro/For 2 1. Supporting Material 2. Supporting Material There is a documentary called weed by Dr. Sanjay Gupta it’s about a 5 year old girl with epilepsy that has over a 100 seizures a week a team of scientist a strain of marijuana that was low in THC(the chemical that gives you that high felling when smoking weed) and high in CBD(a chemical that has numerous health benefits) but instead of letting this 5 year old girl roll up a joint and smoke in they extract the juice from the plant and let her consume it. Almost instantaneously after this treatment this girl went from having over a hundred seizures a week to having 3 or less some weeks she wouldn’t even have any after a year they saw major improvement in the child’s mood and in the child learning ability. (Transition) is there any down sides to this drug you call marijuana? Of course there is there in facts are a lot of reasons why we shouldn’t legalize the drug. We talk about how marijuana has health benefits now let’s talk about the negative side effects. D. Con/Against 1 1. Supporting Material 2. Supporting Material The most common side effect of marijuana is short term memory lose this is a bad thing in many ways especially if you in an unsafe environment like a car. Marijuana also affects brain development, and when it is used heavily by young people. Marijuana smoke is an irritant to the lungs, and frequent marijuana smokers can have many of the same respiratory problems experienced by tobacco smokers, such as daily cough. Marijuana is also been know to lead to depression and suicide in frequent users. (Transition) as now you know marijuana has a few negative health effects of marijuana but they is one more thing you need to conceder one more thing the Gateway theory. E. Con/Against 2 1. Supporting Material 2. Supporting Material Gateway theory states that â€Å"use of certain drugs may lead to an increased risk in the use of other drugs and involvement in criminal behavior.† Smoking a joint might not seem that bad after looking at the positive and negative health effects but before you light up look up the health effects of all the hard drugs out there because no one wakes up and says I’m going to shoot up with 10 mailgrams of heroin today all drug addicts start somewhere and more times than not it starts with tobacco, alcohol and marijuana (Transition) In conclusion. III. Conclusion A. Summary of Main Points B. Restate Purpose C. Reference to Attention-Getter

Tiger Woods Essay -- Golf Biographies Papers

Tiger Woods â€Å"Given the year we just experienced in golf, it would be phenomenal if we see anything in 2001 that will even remotely compare. We witnessed an incredible season by the game’s most dominant player-in this era or any other. We saw how fans and players alike could respect the game in an international competition. And, we have seen the game’s visibility skyrocket† (Strange 20). â€Å"Are you ready for me† (Kindred 232)? -Tiger Woods arriving on the tour with this famous television commercial that presented him not only as a talented golfer but also as an in your face crusader against racial discrimination. These quotes make it clear of Tiger Woods’ impact on the game of golf and the entertainment world in general. But how did he get that way? Under Gardener’s Model, Woods fits in the bodily kinesthetic intelligence, but all professional athletes possess this trait. To be the greatest in the sport of golf, a player must possess multiple intelligences. Tiger Woods is great because he blends that with great intrapersonal, and interpersonal skills, and his minor intelligences of verbal linguistic, and scholastic achievement. Childhood/ Origins of the Dominant Intelligence: Eldrick â€Å"Tiger† Woods is obviously a master in the bodily kinesthetic intelligence. The part African American, part Asian golfer was born December 31, 1975 in Orange County California to Earl and Kultida Woods. Earl Woods introduced him to the game almost immediately, and by the age of two he was already a star, appearing on â€Å"CBS News† and the â€Å"Mike Douglas Show†, putting with the legendary Bob Hope. The next year he shot a 48 for nine holes at the Navy Golf Club in Cypress, California. ... ...4-G8. â€Å"Is Tiger Woods the Greatest Golfer Ever?† http://www.standrewsgolf.ws/tiger-woods 2000. Kindred, Dave. â€Å"Tiger Woods Grows Up. Golf Digest April 2000: 77-78, 232-242. McDaniel, Pete. â€Å"Take the Tiger Test.† Golf Digest April 2000: 80-83. â€Å"PGA Championship Rating Jumps from Last Year.† www.synchrocanada.com/99PGAChamp/aug16-pga.html. 1999. Sherman, Ed. â€Å"Roots of success parked in garage.† www.chicagosports.com. 2001. Spitzer, Gabriel. â€Å"Tiger, Tiger, burning bright-and costing big bucks.† www.medialifemagazine.com. 2001. Strange, Curtis. â€Å"An Eye on the Game.† Golf Magazine January 2001: 20. Villiotte, Erin. â€Å"Williams World Challenge Presented by Target to Benefit Special Charities.† www.twfound.org. 2001, Pgs. 1-2. www.pgatour.com/players/bios. 2001. www.texnews.com. 2001, Pg. 1-5. www.world.std.com. 2001

Freedom of Speech in the Philippines Essay

Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one’s opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. â€Å"Speech† is not limited to public speaking and is generally taken to include other forms of expression. The right is preserved in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is granted formal recognition by the laws of most nations. Nonetheless the degree to which the right is upheld in practice varies greatly from one nation to another. In many nations, particularly those with relatively authoritarian forms of government, overt government censorship is enforced. Censorship has also been claimed to occur in other forms (see propaganda model) and there are different approaches to issues such as hate speech, obscenity, and defamation laws even in countries seen as liberal democracies. Article III Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines specifies that no law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech or of expression. Some laws inconsistent with a broad application of this mandate are in force, however.[29] For example Certain sections of the Flag and Heraldic Code require particular expressions and prohibit other expressions Title thirteen of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines criminalizes libel and slander by act or deed (slander by deed is defined as â€Å"any act †¦ which shall cast dishonor, discredit or contempt upon another person.†), providing penalties of fine or imprisonment. In 2012, acting on a complaint by an imprisoned broadcaster who dramatised a newspaper account reporting that a particular politician was seen running naked in a hotel when caught in bed by the husband of the woman with whom he was said to have spent the night, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights ruled that the criminalization of libel violates freedom of expression and is inconsistent with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, commenting that â€Å"Defamations laws should not †¦ stifle freedom of expression† and that â€Å"Penal defamation laws should include defense of truth.† ************************************************************************* â€Å"If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.† – Noam Chomsky The freedom to express our thoughts is an important part of our individual identity. When we talk and write about our opinions we are contributing ideas and participating in society. Freedom of expression is covered in article 19 of the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights: â€Å"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers†. Freedom of expression is widely acknowledged as a basic human right that should be available to all, playing a crucial role in a fair and open society. Many countries and organizations place limits on freedom of expression. These limitations can be a way of controlling people. Restricting voting rights, censoring speech and art and outlawing specific religious and political groups are some of the tools governments have used to control public opposition. Even societies that consider themselves free and democratic suppress opposing views. Consider your local newspaper; although you might expect objectivity, if you were to analyze the content, you might not find a variety of informed opinions and critiques. Editorial and news writers may be influenced by their own political views. In some places, reporters are trained to manipulate or omit information that could harm those in power. Should there be no limits on freedom of expression? If we are entitled to express ourselves freely we must accept that others will express ideas very different from our own. This might include ideas that offend and possibly even hurt us. Hate speech attacks people based upon such distinctions as race, religion and gender. Should we censor ideas that damage and promote cruelty? The content of a book, a song or a film may cross societal lines of morality and decency. Should we censor art works that are violent, insulting or degrading? These are some of the complex questions you must think about. Feeling intimidated and forced to subscribe to traditional or mainstream beliefs is a violation of your personal freedom. But sometimes authorities set rules and boundaries for good reason. Understanding why the rules exist is more important than automatically obeying them. ***************************************************************************** Cybercrimes and Freedom of Expression Despite the view of the United Nations Committee on Human Rights that Philippine criminal libel is contrary to Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) on freedom of expression, Congress and President Benigno Aquino III still enacted the Cybercrime Prevention Law which, among other things, added electronic libel as a new criminal offense. Worse, this new law increased the penalty for cyber libel to prison mayor from the current prison correctional provided under the Revised Penal Code. This means that electronic libel is now punished with imprisonment from six years and one day to up to 12 years, while those convicted for ordinary libel under the RPC are subject to imprisonment only from six months and one day to four years and two months. And because parole, a means by which a convict may be spared from actual imprisonment may be granted only to those sentenced to serve a prison term for no more than six months and one day, anyone convicted for cyber libel will inevitably serve a prison term. Since the Philippines leads the rest of the world in terms of Facebook and Twitter usage, this means that unlike ordinary libel complaints which are oftentimes brought against printed newspapers -given the element of publication, any user of these leading social media tools is now liable for prosecution. The fact that an allegedly libelous writing appeared on the Internet is already sufficient to prove the element of publication. The new Cybercrime law is an outright defiance of the UN Human Rights Committee View in the case of Alexander Adonis vs. Republic of the Philippines. In that View, the UNHRC declared that Philippine libel law under the RPC contravenes freedom of expression on two counts: one, it is a disproportionate means by which to achieve its avowed goal of protecting the privacy of private persons; and two, because there is an alternative in the form of civil libel, or the payment of damages. The UN HCR also took the view that our libel in the Philippines, because it does not recognize truth as a defense, is additionally defective on this ground. While the View of the UNHRC is this instance is non-binding, the Philippines nonetheless is under an obligation to heed it because of the maxim â€Å"pacta sundt servanda†, or that treaty obligations must be complied with in good faith. The UN Human Rights Committee Views, since the membership of the body consist of leading experts in human rights, are accepted as authoritative on the issue of states compliance with their obligations under the ICCPR. Simply put, the view against our libel law is very strong evidence of breach of a state obligation under the ICCPR And instead of heeding the UN’s call to review its existing libel law, Congress and President Aquino appeared to have slammed the body by enacting an even more draconian legislation against cyber libel. Our constitutional commitment to freedom of expression has long been recognized. Justice Holmes, for instance, wrote: â€Å"When men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas — that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market . . . .† The commitment exists because it is only through freedom of expression that we are able to discern the truth and able to fiscalize despotic regimes: â€Å"The freedom to speak one’s mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty—and thus a good unto itself—but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole. We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions. By criminalizing internet libel, government expanded the infringement of freedom of expression even to the realm that has enabled us to give life to the principle of a free market place of ideas- the internet. Prior to this law, it is ironic that the Philippines was even cited by the United Nations for not interfering with the internet. The law is a testament to the reality that despite the overwhelming mandate given to this administration, coupled with its unprecedented public approval ratings, it continues to be insecure and unable to compete in the market place of ideas. We will see the Aquino administration in court on this one. And we will prevail. For unlike other laws that enjoy the presumption of regularity, this cybercrime law, insofar as it infringes on freedom of expression, will come to court with a very heavy presumption of unconstitutionality. There can be nothing sadder than suing the son of icons of democracy for infringement into a cherished right. ************************************************************************* IMPORTANCE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION Article 19 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) guarantees the right to freedom of expression in the following terms: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes the right to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The UDHR, as a UN General Assembly resolution, is not directly binding on States. However, parts of it, including Article 19, are widely regarded as having acquired legal force as customary international law since its adoption in 1948. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), a treaty ratified by over 150 States, including the Philippines, imposes formal legal obligations on State Parties to respect its provisions and elaborates on many of the rights included in the UDHR. Article 19 of the ICCPR guarantees the right to freedom of expression in terms very similar to those found at Article 19 of the UDHR: 1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of opinion. 2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art or through any other media of his choice. Freedom of expression is also protected in all three regional human rights instruments, by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The right to freedom of expression enjoys a prominent status in each of these regional conventions and, although the Philippines cannot be a party to them, the judgments and decisions issued by courts under these regional mechanisms, offer an authoritative interpretation of freedom of expression principles in various different contexts. Freedom of expression is a key human right, in particular because of its fundamental role in underpinning democracy. At its very first session, in 1946, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 59(I) which states: â€Å"Freedom of information is a fundamental human right and †¦ the touchstone of all the freedoms to which the United Nations is consecrated.† As the UN Human Rights Committee has said: â€Å"The right to freedom of expression is of paramount importance in any democratic society.† RESTRICTIONS OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION The right to freedom of expression is not absolute; both international law and most national constitutions recognise that it may be restricted. However, any limitations must remain within strictly defined parameters. Article 19(3) of the ICCPR lays down the conditions which any restriction on freedom of expression must meet: The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary: (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals. A similar formulation can be found in the European, American and African regional human rights treaties. These have been interpreted as requiring restrictions to meet a strict three-part test. International jurisprudence makes it clear that this test presents a high standard which any interference must overcome. The European Court of Human Rights has stated: â€Å"Freedom of expression †¦ is subject to a number of exceptions which, however, must be narrowly interpreted and the necessity for any restrictions must be convincingly established.† First, the interference must be provided for by law. This requirement will be fulfilled only where the law is accessible and ‘formulated with sufficient precision to enable the citizen to regulate his conduct’. Second, the interference must pursue a legitimate aim. The list of aims in Article 19(3) of the ICCPR is exclusive in the sense that no other aims are considered to be legitimate as grounds for restricting freedom of expression. Third, the restriction must be necessary to secure one of those aims. The word â€Å"necessary† means that there must be a â€Å"pressing social need† for the restriction. The reasons given by the State to justify the restriction must be â€Å"relevant and sufficient† and the restriction must be proportionate to the aim pursued. The Constitution of the Philippines, however, does not explicitly provide for restrictions to the right to freedom of expression. The only restriction to the rights to expression and information and press freedom is encapsulated in the provision on the right to privacy. Article III, Sections 3 of the Constitution states: (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law. (2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE MEDIA The guarantee of freedom of expression applies with particular force to the media, including the broadcast media and public service broadcasters. The European Court of Human Rights, for example, has consistently emphasised the â€Å"pre-eminent role of the press in a State governed by the rule of law†. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has stated: â€Å"It is the mass media that make the exercise of freedom of expression a reality.† Media as a whole merit special protection, in part because of their role in making public ‘information and ideas on matters of public interest. Not only does [the press] have the task of imparting such information and ideas: the public also has a right to receive them. Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of â€Å"public watchdog†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢. It may be noted that the obligation to respect freedom of expression lies with States, not with the media per se. However, this obligation does apply to publicly-funded broadcasters. Because of their link to the State, these broadcasters are directly bound by international guarantees of human rights. In addition, publicly-funded broadcasters are in a special position to satisfy the public’s right to know and to guarantee pluralism and access, and it is therefore particularly important that they promote these rights.

Cybercrime as an international problem - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 7 Words: 2234 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/08/16 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Cyber Crime Essay Did you like this example? Cybercrime is an international problem thats faced every day. Regardless of the prevention techniques in place, the infrastructure of companies, corporations, and individuals are at risk for various types of cybercrimes. Cybercrimes are defined by Mirriam-Webster as criminal activities that are carried out using a computer especially when transmitting, manipulating, or accessing data (Miriam-Webster 2018). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Cybercrime as an international problem" essay for you Create order Currently, there is no way to completely prevent these crimes from occurring, however it is possible to put best practices into place. The United States uses three broad approaches in effort to prevent and react to cybercrimes: Criminal, civil, and voluntary industry guidelines. Internationally these industry best practices vary. After a comparison of the U.S. and international law, the U.S. application of all three practices appears to be the best technique for prevention and response to cybercrimes, however the UK, Russia, and China also have excellent laws and regulations in place. While these countries have a great set of comprehensive laws, there is always room for improvement. United States Approach to Cybersecurity: As mentioned above the United States incorporates three different approaches for cybersecurity. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2015 cover the criminal sanction while the laws pertaining to negligence and HIPPA compliance in the health care field set forth civil liability. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a cybersecurity framework that sets forth a voluntary standard. Criminal: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) of 1986 18 U.S.C.S. Â § 1030, an amendment to the computer fraud law, made it a federal crime to access computers without appropriate authorization and obtaining any information about any US department or agency, financial records/consumer information, and anything collected from a protected computer. The United States v. Nosal outlined the definition of exceeds authorized access as authorized access to computers and use access to obtain or alter information that the accessor does not have entitlement to do so (United States v Nosal, 676 F3d 854 [9th Cir 2012].) The act has been amended several times since inception, and has expanded its scope beyond its original intention which covered only U.S. government computer and some financial systems. The Patriot Act of 2001 came shortly after the 9/11 attacks and was an update to the CFAA allowing for expanded access for law enforcement to investigate possible acts of terrorism. In 2015, President Ba rack Obamas administration saw a major problem in the United States infrastructure finding that several hundreds of millions of dollars has been stolen via intrusion due to the weakness, and the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)(18 U.S Code Chapter 96) was put in place in an effort to rid organized crime in the United States. Penalties for violation of the CFAA include range from fines to imprisonment up to 20 years in some instances. Civil: There are several laws that are organized to handle civil cases of cybercrimes. Two major examples are Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) which protects patient data/medical information transmitted electronically and negligence laws that forces people to follow a certain level of care for others. While HIPPA is a federal law, negligence laws are set forth by individual states. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is the enforcement authority for the HIPPA act and enforces the penalties. Since the medical field is moving toward electronic filing, billing, and monitoring of patient information for efficient, HIPPA has never been more important as a national standard. Health plans, health care providers (providing they electronically transmit health information), heath care clearinghouse, and any business associates (such as pharmacy) that fall under the umbrella of those needing to abide by HIPPA regulation. It covers any physical and mental health information, wh at treatment is being received, and any financial/payment information of an individual. HIPPA requires any entity with access to health care information to retrieve an authorization for the electronic transmission, and requires a notice of the privacy practices. Penalties for non-compliance can range anywhere from $100 to $50,000. A second important civil law is negligence. Each state may have different standards for negligence. As previously stated, individuals are required to act in a manner that shows a duty of care to other individuals. Duty of care is a basic requirement that an individual act with a carefulness, attention, and consideration towards other in order to prevent the risk of harm. There are four elements necessary to prove negligence, 1. Proof that an individual had a legal duty of care to the other, 2. A breach of that duty of care, 3. Because of that breach an injury was suffered, and, 4. Proximate cause. Failure to provide the appropriate duty of care to another results in fines that can vary in degree depending on the level of injury to a person. Voluntary Standard: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has a framework tha outlines protection for infrastructures, and that have a systematic process to identify, assess, and managed cybersecurity risk (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018). While this framework is a voluntary framework, its an industry best standard and was designed with the help of several individuals in the industry, government, and academia through several workshops around the country (NIST, 2018). There are no civil or criminal ramifications for not using the standard, but it should be understood that not using this framework or another standard could result in civil and criminal suits. This framework helps cover the necessary aspects for prevention and response to cybersecurity incidents. The NIST framework covers five core functions that include Identification, Protection, Detection and follows with Response, and Recovery techniques. These five core functions help manage risk assessment whi ch can identify the crown jewels of a company (those things that need to be protected), assess possible breaches/cybersecurity instances, and allows for a plan of response and recovery in the instance of a breach. The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 was an effort to improve cybersecurity research and development; the act authorized financial allotment for continued research and helps to educate the public on awareness and preparedness. (Heckert, 2010). United Kingdom (UK) Approach to Cybercrime: Criminal : The Computer Misuse Act enacted (CMA) in 1990 made it so that without authorization from the owner of the data there could be no changes to the information whether on a computer or on another device. This Act was derived from Regina v. Gold and Schifreen, 1998 which was a case where the defendants hacked into the computer system of the Duke of Edinburgs email using an ID and password that was not authorized for their use. The CMA cited different criminal offenses: unauthorized access to carry out further offenses, modify material, and general unauthorized access to a computer. Punishment is generally around twelve months and a fine. In 2015, the act was modified in order to coincide with the Serious Crime Act which aided law enforcement with search and seizure operations. This Serous Crime Act could lead to up to 14 years in prison and a large fine (What is the Computer Misuse Act, 2018). Civil: The Data Protection Act of 1988 (DPA) was an act that worked to protect the personal data of an individual that was being stored on a computer and was replaced by the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). The GDPR was approved in April of 2016, and fully implemented two years later, in May 2018. The GDPR covers the member states of the European Union, with the purpose of protecting the EU citizens personal data from data and privacy breaches. Changes that came with the GDPR include a clear jurisdictional extension that covers any and all companies that collect and process personal data in the EU including those who outsource the information, whereas previously the DPA was ambiguous. The GDPR made it mandatory for national states to This is done by regulating usage of personal data by any company, organization, or individual that processes it for non-personal usage; regardless of the type of technology that is used. The regulation does not only cover processing that is done in t he EU, rather it covers EU citizens regardless of where the processing occurs, making it globally effective. Processing includes collection, storage, transmission, and recording among many others in relation to personal information. Personal data is defined in the GDPR as information that can identify an individual or relates to the identity of a living person, or information that may be put together to identify a person. (European Commission, 2018). This information includes, but is not limited to information such as name, address, email, ID card, location data, and any information help by a doctor/hospital. This information is no longer considered identifiable once it has been encrypted or goes through the process of anonymization (European Commission, 2018). The GDPR also made it mandatory for any breaches to be announced within the first 72 hours of awareness. In order to be compliant within with the GDPR organizations must get consent from customers/consumers prior to storing a nd processing data. There must also be a Data Processing Officer within each organization who is appointed to monitor data, as well as the necessity for breach notification. Data Protection Impact Assessments need to be completed. The organizations must Data Protection Authorities (DPA) are the authority that investigate and correct any issues and complaints that are lodged for non-compliance and are considered supervisory. Each nation state has their own DPA, and each state decides what the penalty is for non-compliance. The penalties range through a variety of fines and can be as high as 4% or as low as 2% of the previous years revenue (GDPREU.org, 2018). China China has no data protection laws that are comprehensive but are rather spread apart across several laws and regulations that have already been enacted. These regulations can be found throughout the General Principles of Civil Law and Tort Liability Law, as well as the Criminal Law of the Peoples Republic (Data Protection Laws of the World, 2018). In 2017, the first national-level law went into effect which was called the Cybersecurity Law and was the first enacted law to discuss data privacy and cybersecurity. This law was to protect and safeguard online information for citizens and legal entities. China collectively use the Decision on Strengthening Online Information Protection and NIST as a backbone to help create such data protection rules. The Cyberspace Administration of China is the authority for data protection in China, but there is also the PBOC or CBRC who are involved with regulation of larger financial institutions. China requires permission from the owner of personal d ata prior to its allowance to be transferred or disclosed. Only when data is collected appropriately and necessarily while abiding by the regulations can organizations collected, store, and use personal information. It requires organizations to take appropriate measures against processing data illegally/exposure of personal information by ensuring proper protect systems are in place. It doesnt appear to have a timeline for notification of data breaches, however it does require notification to be made to those effected within a timely manner (Data Protection Laws of the World, 2018). Enforcement for cybersecurity crimes vary from fines all the way to criminal activity. Chinas law making is beginning to lean towards forming more laws and regulations that are similar to the GDPR making it more effective overall. Russia The bulk of the cybersecurity laws in Russia are embedded in the legislation of the Data Protection Act, while the Russian Construction covers the privacy rights of individuals. Prior to 2014, Russia didnt focus on data protection as much as it should have. However, in 2014, Russia began regulating the usage of personal data. The focus was on data processors, and required the information to be processed inside Russia, instead of using outside sources. The regulations require full disclosure and transparency about a businesss privacy practices, and permissions from the owner of the data in order to transfer it. The DPA requires a data control officer to be appointment in order to oversee compliance with regulation. The federal government (The Agency) is the authority for seeking repercussions for now complying with the cybersecurity practices. Penalties for not following the requirements set forth for cybersecurity protection as subject to the shit down of any websites that participat e in unlawful acts and requires registrations on the Register of Infringers of Rights of Personal Data Subjects (Data Protection Laws of the World, 2018). In the event of a data breach, there is unfortunately no requirement for reporting. In conclusion, while the United States seems to have the best practices when it comes to cybersecurity, considering it covers civil and criminal sanctions along with a voluntary framework, other countries have also set forth excellent cybersecurity regimes. The United Kingdom is an under the umbrella of the EU, and is covered under the GDPR, but also has its own civil sanction making it very strong overall with cybersecurity practices. China, while working on cybersecurity laws has the regulation buried throughout its current law system and covers a vast majority of necessary prevention techniques and enforcement related to cybercrimes. As mentioned above, Chinas laws are very similar to the EU GDPR. Lastly, Russia, has several specific laws and uses the DPA in order to protect its citizens data. While some countries do not cover regulation in civil and criminal penalties, and do not have voluntary frameworks, the United States has the most articulated and mature laws and regulations for cybersecurity. Its important that these acts and laws continue to be amended and grow, so that there is always protection of personal data.